HEARING DATE: 4-8-03
TIME: 9:00 A.M.
PLAINTIFF?SDECLARATION/CERTIFICATION IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY DEFENDANT DEARENOSA; PLAINTIFF?S REITERATION OF REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF DEFENDANT DE ARENOSA?S CLEAR CRIME OF PERJURY.
I, Albert L. Peia, hereby certify and declare under penalty of perjury as follows:
1. I am the pro se plaintiff in the present matter and if called upon to testify I could and would competently testify (truthfully) to the following facts of my own personal knowledge.
2. A review of the Court record underlying defendant Dearenosa?s crime of perjury would reveal that defendant DeArenosa did not attend even one status conference which also, by way of plaintiff?s ?status filing? therein would have set forth the fact of defendant Ojeda?s default,in addition to the fact of defendant DeArenosa?s receipt of Plaintiff?s Request to Default Judgment along with accompanying Declaration in Support thereof and the Entry of Default as set forth herein. Defendants Ojeda and DeArenosa are inveterate liars.
3. In the aforesaid matter underlying defendant De-Arenosa?s crime of perjury, he had previously been sanctioned by the Court for failing to appear and respondto a prior Order to Show Cause.
4. In the instant case, defendant DeArenosa offered no response to the Order to Show Cause in his ?Answer?(sic) and upon being queried by the Court as to whether he understood what having his answer striken meant, he, defendant DeArenosa responded affirmatively, ?yes?, without either objection or further discussion (despite being accorded the opportunity for same at that time ? probably, and I am inferring beyond the scope of this declaration/certification and not a part hereof, thankful for the Court?s mercy in not having him arrested for his crime of perjury).
5. Defendant DeArenosa should be criminally prosecuted for his crime of perjury and disbarred.
6. In light of the foregoing, in the practical interest of very busy courts, sound judicial economy and credibility in the process, and in the paramount judicial interests of truth and justice, defendant DeArenosa?s Motion for Reconsideration should be DENIED, and a criminal referral of his clear crime of perjury should issue forthwith.
I declare under penalty of perjury pursuant to the laws of the state of California and the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Respectfully Submitted by and,
Dated: 3-15-03 Signed: Albert L. Peia, Pro Se
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
I, Albert L. Peia, hereby certify that a copy of PLAINTIFF?S DECLARATION/CERTIFICATION IN OPPOSITION TODEFENDANT DEARENOSA?S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; and,REQUEST FOR CRIMINAL REFERRAL OF DEFENDANT DEARENOSA?SCRIME OFPERJURY, havebeen served by regular first class U.S. mail, postageprepaid, on this ___18th__ day of March, 2003, uponthe following: Rene Lopez DeArenosa 7542 Lankershim Blvd., Suite 2 North Hollywood, CA 91605-2804 Dated: 3-18-03 Signed:_____________________________ Albert L. Peia, Pro Se
"Informing business owners of their obligations under Federal Copyright Law is one of ASCAP's key roles," said Vincent Candilora, Senior Vice President of Licensing at ASCAP. "We provide any business using music the opportunity to receive permission through acceptance of a license covering the use of over 8 million copyrighted songs and compositions, and we make every effort to educate business owners concerning their music licensing responsibilities. If our good efforts are ignored, then our only recourse is legal action."
During 2004, ASCAP achieved a 100% success rate with its copyright infringement litigation, with all concluded cases resulting in either a cash settlement or a judgment in favor of ASCAP members. This is significant as ASCAP represents over 200,000 member owners who, for the most part, are songwriters and composers who rely heavily on their ASCAP royalties, as well as ASCAP's enforcement efforts on their behalf. Over 86 cents of every dollar collected is distributed to its members, the music creators.
According to Vince Abbatiello, ASCAP Vice President of Sales and Director of General Licensing, "When business owners ignore their obligations and violate Federal Copyright Law, they are actually stealing from the songwriters and composers who created the music compositions that those businesses are using. Individual songwriters and composers are the ultimate small business people, working on their own with limited opportunity for sustained success. We only take legal action when all other means of resolution have been exhausted. But when we litigate on behalf of our members, our success rate is always very high. Business owners who ignore the Copyright Law in the belief that they can escape penalty should treat this very seriously. Don't steal our members' music."
Establishment, City and State: Challengers, Pelham, AL Back Porch, Tuscalossa, AL Hard Dock Cafe, Decatur, AL Saddlerack, Chandler, AZ Josh Slocum's, Newport Beach, CA Joe's Cafe, Branford, CT Home Nightclub, Washington, DC Jade, Miami Beach, FL Estate (f/k/a Nocturnal), Chicago, IL Hundred South Grille a/k/a 100 South Chop House, Elmhurst, IL Le Passage/Yow Bar, Chicago, IL Costello's, Jamaica Plain, MA Buffalo Billiards, Gaithersburg, MD American Sports Cafe, St. Paul, MN Buffalo Tap & Grille, Savage, MN Soulard Ale House, St. Louis, MO Gilligan's, Surf City, NC J. Lindsay's, Columbus, OH Denim, Philadelphia, PA R.P. McMurphy's, Holmes, PA Wolfy's, Nashville, TN Happy Town Karaoke, Houston, TX OUI Club, Wichita Falls, TX Scuttlebutts Restaurant and Bar, Lubbock, TX
Established in 1914, ASCAP is the first and leading Performing
Rights Organization in the U.S., representing the world's largest
music repertory. ASCAP is committed to protecting the rights of its
members by licensing and collecting royalties for the public
performance of their copyrighted works, and then distributing these
fees to the Society's members based on performances. Unlike the other
American Performing Rights Organizations, ASCAP's Board of Directors
is made up solely of writers and publishers, elected by the membership
every two years. Every year ASCAP provides over $3 million dollars in
special awards to promising music creators whose works may be
performed in venues that may not be actively surveyed. And the ASCAP
Foundation, established in 1975 by ASCAP members, has the mission of
nurturing new talent and promoting music education. It has assisted
countless aspiring music creators in career development and
ASCAP Pauline Stack, 212-621-6278 email@example.comSource: ASCAP
Parenthetically, the following should be noted:
Clintonian Davis is ?Totally Recalled? and ?Terminated?
Congratulations to the next Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and to California, as the state begins to dig itself out of the clintonian/davis/boxer/feinstein hole, years in the making. What still amazes me is how californians are loathe to posit responsibility for the state's current crisis with (all) those responsible; viz., boxer, feinstein, the clintons, etc.. Indeed, a wealth of gratitude is owed to Darrell Issa for his foresight and courage and who, for the sake of the state of California, should replace the incompetent, self-interested boxer or feinstein (whoever comes sooner although both have to go) who have been precipitous causes of california's crisis. While the state's turnaround will take time (and Arnold's efforts), the future of the State of California is now assured. Dateline:8-9-03 - One should not take new California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger lightly. He has global stature, says what he means, and means what he says. Indeed, even his films have presciently dealt with some of the crucial issues of the times; viz., ie., 'Total Recall'(energy); 'Sixth Day'(cloning); Terminator (potential for nuclear holocaust); etc.. A denizen of California himself, Peter Drucker has in his unsurpassed writings on management distinguished between being efficient and effective. For the sake of brevity let me assume arguendo, davis' (as well as fellow clintonians boxer's, feinstein's, etc.) efficiency based upon years of bureaucratic "experience", they have not been effective; that is, they have not done the right things for California (I think everyone would agree that the astute Herbert Hoover was efficient, but glaringly ineffective.) While I am sure Arnold and his people would not "approve" of the way I phrase the following, I must truthfully say that Californians are fortunate/lucky that he even wants to be governor of this clintonian/davis/boxer/feinstein mess called California and are lucky to have him as the 'People's Governor', as he puts it. In concluding, let me respond to the 'burned-out incompetent bureacrat davis' false rhetoric, that Arnold doesn't even know where Sacremento is; let every Californian remember that it has been most unfortunate for them that davis does (know where Sacramento is). This is Arnold's year. Congratulations to the next Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and to the people of California. Dateline: 8-16-03
While there are innumerable reasons why Arnold Schwarzenegger will be the great and competent Governor of the State of California that he will be, even assuming arguendo, the only reason for same was that he has secured Warren Buffet as his economic advisor for California in this time of economic crisis, that of itself would be sufficient.While I am sure Arnold and his people would not "approve" of the way I phrase the following, I must truthfully say that Californians are fortunate/lucky that Buffet even wants to be economic advisor in this clintonian/davis/boxer/feinstein mess called California and are also lucky to have Arnold as the 'People's Governor', as he puts it. Indeed, as one can expect from the clintonian/incompetent davis, the state's crisis has not even been marginally addressed, much less solved, but rather for political expediency (typical modus operandi), deferred (until next year?). Bustamonte is a joke (as is davis), who is part of the problem (know nothing/do nothing) (as is davis) pandering (to the latino vote and others, as is davis). Ariana Huffington (conservative turned liberal - who stands for absolutely nothing/even her former marriage was a sham) is also a joke. Simple Simon blew his opportunity and , along with McClintock, Ueuberroth, etc., is (are) virtually unelectable as Governor of California. The clintonian davis/boxer/feinstein crowd (typically) disdainfully (of the California electorate) seem a bit too presumptuous in assuming what would necessarily have to be a combination of amnesiac stupidity, lack of resolve, and absence of courage among the Californians who have risen to the occasion (of crisis) and admirably "taken on the corrupt, bankrupt, inept clintonian/davis/boxer/feinstein machine", concomitantly saving themselves, their families, friends and the State of California thereby.
Congratulations to the next Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and to the People of California.
Simple simon suffers from and still bears the mark of a loser, having blown his opportunity (through stupidity - "the fund-raising trap", etc.), being unelectable he hopes to blow California's only opportunity for a return to prosperity. Indeed, neither he nor the unelectables ueuberroth, huffington, etc., even dare to broach part of the problem in California to the tune of billions of dollars the state doesn't have, viz., illegal immigration. Any legally immigrated Latino should not fear this topic since addressing this problem would only innure to their own and their (legal) families' benefits in this now crisis situation. The incompetent davis of the incompetent clinton [clinton squandered the nation's cold war victory and surpluses and goodwill engendered thereby - communism is total b**l s**t (everyone is equal except some, bureacrats/party officials are more equal than others) and doesn't work/ask the Russians - and left the nation as he left arkansas, corrupt and a mess, last in almost every measurable category), boxer, bustamonte, feinstein, etc., mold (they must be held accountable for the state's crisis/predicament) is now supposedly signing a bill to grant drivers' licenses to illegal immigrants, as well as benefits (education, health, etc.) which is the height of absurdity (the State is broke from same, the highest energy costs in the nation thanks to the incompetent davis contracts, and the list goes on) having encouraged the deluge (pandered to "future potential voters", you know "crap on american soil", etc.). Arnold is himself a legal immigrant.
The following is also apposite:
MENU TITLE: Gang Crime Recordkeeping Series: NIJ Research in Brief Published: June 1994 (NCJ 148345) 20 pages Gang Crime and Law Enforcement Recordkeeping by G. David Curry, Richard A. Ball, and Robert J. Fox ------------------- EXCERPT 'Of the police departments reporting gang crime problems, almost all said they recorded the race or ethnicity of gang members. As with other types of data noted above, there was a difference between recording information and being able to report that information in summary form. Of the 72 large city police departments reporting gang crime problems, only 25 (35 percent) provided statistics on the ethnicity of identified gang members; of the 38 smaller cities, only 12 (32 percent) provided statistics on ethnicity. The ethnic composition of gang members in these cities remains predominantly black (48 percent) and Hispanic (43 percent). The black groups were made up primarily of African-Americans but also included Jamaicans and blacks of other countries.' The Color of Crime: a report on 1994 crime statistics, the most recent available. Major Findings: # There is more black-on-white than black-on-black violent crime. # Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence involving blacks and whites, 90 percent are committed by blacks against whites. Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse. # Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate. Hispanics commit violent crimes at approximately three times the white rate, and Asians at one half to three quarters the white rate. # Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes. # Hispanics are a hate crime victim category but not a perpetrator category. Hispanic offenders are classified as whites, which inflates the white offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit no hate crimes. # Blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous than women. Copyright ? 1999 by New Century Foundation Click here for more.
Dateline: 8-25-03 - Yes, It is True.
The trumps, being "bottom feeders" have despoiled the likes of new york, new jersey (totally disgusting place), and now california (if you could even imagine a more sordid scenario in the aforesaid pervasively criminal/corrupt states)].
Through implication (ie., court decisions construing amendments to the U.S. Constitution) and directly (ie., state constitutions, federal and state statutes), privacy rights have been recognized and upheld. The common law also provides for a cause of action predicated upon the tort of invasion of privacy. There are four acts which may underpin a(n) (tort) action for and qualify as invasion of privacy:
An apposite observation by Ted Lang:
'Only Mel Gibson, a notable member of the Hollywood entertainment media, has supported American interests through his art form. Jews predominate media ownership in terms of newspapers, publishing and Hollywood entrepreneurship, and hundreds of movies and TV programs have been produced depicting Hitler?s Holocaust made possible by gun control. Where are similar movies showing the persecution and much larger body count and suffering perpetrated by the communists of the former Soviet Union and Soviet Russia? How many of such productions have been released? It is quite clear that liberals didn?t appreciate Mel Gibson?s movie "The Patriot," because it clearly spelled out how a people were able to stand up to government tyranny via gun ownership. And now, an organization of "Jews" calling themselves the "Anti-Defamation League" is attacking Gibson?s artistic expression as he passionately tries to portray his passion for his religion. The ADL is a fraud! This is a contemptible minority organization of despicably intolerant anti-American, anti-Christian agitators and activists. The only ones they are protecting from defamation are Hitler and Mussolini in principle, and Joe Stalin and communism in total!' "Published originally at EtherZone.com : republication allowed with this notice and hyperlink intact." Mail this article to a friend(s) in two clicks! ------------------------ Ted Lang is a columnist for the The Patriotist and the Sierra Times He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
What a gutless wonder rupert murdoch is! Imagine. He buckles under to the Christ-killing-jew lobby that with typical paranoic fear of the truth has sought what every Christ-killing jew practices daily in covering up their crimes and the truth, censorship of the truth.(Always Remember: The Only Good Jew is a Dead Jew!) By failing to pick up Mel Gibson's Great and inspired work, 'The Passion', murdoch has proven to be just another fast buck artist contributing to the decline of the media in general, and television in particular ("reality shows", etc.). Maybe he can get that hypocritical slob/employee gingrich to do a little "schmoozing" for a few regulatory favors (since he certainly isn't good for much else).
Dateline: 9-4-03 On this day, I believe not coincidental that I was on my way to Kinko's to make some copies for legal papers that were to be filed on 9-5-03 against 2 typical hispanic criminals, I was threatened and then assaulted by an hispanic who lay in wait as I walked down 3rd street, LA (the little niggeria, little liberia, little mexico section adjacent to little tokyo). Indeed, I was hit from behind on the back side of my head more than once before I was able to block same with my arms and ultimately partially tackling this very heavy (more than 250 pounds) typically uncivilized hispanic. A struggle ensued as I was cognizant of and concerned with my documents which were to be filed. He continued to threaten to hurt me/"fuck me up" as I awaited an opportunity to break free and grab my case with legal papers, which I did, and then entered the first nearby open door after unsuccessfully failing to flag down passing motorists. The door was that of the little tokyo branch of the LA public library where after some initial difficulty I was able to call 911/LAPD. I emerged from the library to look for the LAPD squad car only to see the perpetrator threateningly coming back toward me. I went back toward the library door. This happened several times with my hope to "buy time" for the LAPD to arrive, and arrest this typical uncivilized hispanic/slob/criminal. So brazened was this clintonian/davis/bustamante uncivilized hispanic that he indeed did accommodate me in threateningly reapproaching me each time I emerged from near the library door. An LAPD squad car was passing (though not the one dispatched) and I flagged it down. I gave the description of the perpetrator to LAPD Officers Todd and Velasco who took off in the direction of the perpetrator and with great retention and eye were able to spot the perp as he was about to board a bus, and by blocking the bus were ultimately able to make the arrest. It was great LAPD police work. The perpetrator was also a (prior) sex offender. Reality: In sum, californian's have the opportunity to rise above their (apparently deserved in light of clintonians davis/bustamonte/boxer/feinstein, p/t fruit pickers, gardeners- f/t criminals/illegal immigrants/ democrat voting block/supporters) moniker as the "land of fruits and nuts" and throw the corrupt, incompetent clintonian criminals out.
To Whom It May Concern:
MENU TITLE: Gang Crime Recordkeeping
Series: NIJ Research in Brief
Published: June 1994 (NCJ 148345)
Gang Crime and Law Enforcement Recordkeeping
by G. David Curry, Richard A. Ball, and Robert J.
'Of the police departments reporting gang crime
problems, almost all said they recorded the race or
ethnicity of gang members. As with other types of
data noted above, there was a difference between
recording information and being able to report that
information in summary form. Of the 72 large city
police departments reporting gang crime problems,
only 25 (35 percent) provided statistics on the
ethnicity of identified gang members; of the 38
smaller cities, only 12 (32 percent) provided
statistics on ethnicity. The ethnic
composition of gang members in these cities
remains predominantly black (48 percent) and
Hispanic (43 percent). The black groups were made
up primarily of African-Americans but also included
Jamaicans and blacks of other countries.'
The Color of Crime: a report on 1994 crime statistics, the most recent available.
# There is more black-on-white than black-on-black violent crime.
# Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence involving blacks and whites, 90 percent are committed by blacks against whites. Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse.
# Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate. Hispanics commit violent crimes at approximately three times the white rate, and Asians at one half to three quarters the white rate.
# Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes.
# Hispanics are a hate crime victim category but not a perpetrator category. Hispanic offenders are classified as whites, which inflates the white offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit no hate crimes.
# Blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous than women.
Copyright ? 1999 by New Century Foundation
More police are necessary, LAPD's budget should be increased from whatever source:
Rationale: (1) Educational funds are worthless in an environment of lawless uncivilized gang and other indigenous criminals who intimidate, threaten, harrass and commit crimes against children wanting to learn. (2)Health related funds or other programs are not salutary in a scenario of crimes against person and property in an atmosphere of intimidation, fear, and threats against person and property. (3) What businesses would locate or stay in a city/state as LA/CA in the clintonian/davis/boxer/feinstein/bustamante mold; ETC..
A Great Job Well Done By LAPD!
It is Time for Some Reality in California
Women's groups who condemn newly arrived Arnold for 30 years ago trying to "be one of the guys" with that typical california/la black hoe [while I have known many women in the biblical sense (I am exclusively heterosexual and "too territorial" for such (somewhat sordid) group activity], I also have never engaged in (the biblically proscribed act of) beastiality; that is, had sex with a black (female) ape (negroe), (and never will); although I must admit that the 2 non-mexican hispanics and my ex-wife (mistakes never to be repeated) come very close to exactly that, and cite the alleged gropes in an industry where far worse is common place, have less than zero credibility. Indeed, they were, as boxer, glaringly silent as to hillbilly clinton who has raped (ie., Juanita Broaddrick, etc.) click , sexually assaulted (ie., dismissal from Oxford, Katherine Willey, etc.), and a defacto party to murders to cover his crimes, click the following:page1, page2, page3, page4, page5, page6, and don't forget hillbilly clinton's partner in crime, hillary- Click here . Not even a whimper of protest from these "women's groups", nor from the clintonian hypocrite/incompetent boxer who hounded Bob Packwood from office for some "stolen kisses". Nor are the desperate, incompetent hypocrites focusing on the documented elder employee abuse at the hands of the proven incompetent slug, davis. CLICK HERE These desperate (but typical of their ilk) last minute smears on Arnold by the incompetent clintonian davis/bustamonte/boxer/feinstein crowd ignore the fact of Arnold having an enduring marriage in an industry where such is an extreme rarity, described by his wife as a great husband and father. Indeed, so "Hollywood-lite" was Arnold's alleged behavior where far worse is typical, if not even expected of the "virile, male action star" that even assuming (though I am not) the truth of same, though not laudable, given the "Hollywood context", the ineluctible question is, "Where's the beef?". The incompetent clintonian davis/bustamonte/boxer/feinstein gang can't discuss their clear record of failure for the state of california, so with the help of a (left-leaning) less than fair media, Arnold is the object of the typical smear campaign to the detriment of the state of california. Remember, hillbilly clinton's rape of Juanita Broderick was violent, among his other sexual assaults. Where was the clintonian davis/bustamonte/boxer/feinstein gang on criminal clinton's egregious acts? Former "ultra-conservative" (not long ago) now "ultra-liberal" publicity hound, arianna huffington (who literally drove her former husband into the arms of men, or alternatively, had a sham marriage ab initio) has zero credibility and has seen even her children abandon her owing to her broken promises to them.
The hillbilly from arkansas, former "lord of the flies", with offices in harlem, n.y., with his "bros", and now a residence in ireland to appreciate his "white nigger" heritage (still up in the air in light of the documented fact of his questionable paternity - there have been conflicting claims - bastard-son-of-a-drunken-whore that clinton is, is ("what is the meaning?") an underlying cause of america's problems today after 8 years of "getting blown", launching "wag-the-dog" cruise missiles abroad, and squandering a long, hard fought cold war victory (consistent with his own leftist political persuasion). Clinton's communist china connection has been documented with authority (ie., 'Year of the Rat', Timberlake, etc.)along with his involvement in the illegal cocaine trade in mena, arkansas click here, and don't forget arkansas companies tyson foods, cocaine smuggled in frozen chickens click here (part of state police report also involving dan lasater, convicted cocaine distributor along with roger clinton, investigation ordered shut down by feds) , and Walmart, the first major importer/reseller of cheap communist china prison slave labor goods. Lest people forget, negroes sold other vanguished (by negroes) negroes into slavery at a time when slavery was globally accepted, to america's substantial detriment.
I (and the rest of the world) will soon know whether civilized behavior in accordance with a meaningful rule of law (the only thing precluding devolution of the u.s. into chaos and anarchy) is even possible at all in the so-called u.s.
It matters little to me,
I hate Pat McCoid's and her family's guts; I hate Pat McCoid;
I hate Pat M. I will have nothing whatsoever to do with them (as with
the other RICO and other defendants set forth herein), directly or indirectly.
The foregoing will never change, not ever!
Another message that won't ever change:
I am interested in no real property whatsoever to resolve the RICO Litigation,
but rather only in the very substantial money damages in accordance with law.
Al Peia ,
but it should matter a lot to you!
In sum, californian's have the opportunity to rise above their (apparently deserved in light of clintonians davis/bustamonte/boxer/feinstein, p/t fruit pickers, gardeners- f/t criminals/illegal immigrants/ democrat voting block/supporters) moniker as the "land of fruits and nuts" and throw the corrupt, incompetent clintonian criminals out.
To Whom It May Concern:
MENU TITLE: Gang Crime Recordkeeping Series: NIJ Research in Brief Published: June 1994 (NCJ 148345) 20 pages Gang Crime and Law Enforcement Recordkeeping by G. David Curry, Richard A. Ball, and Robert J. Fox ------------------- EXCERPT 'Of the police departments reporting gang crime problems, almost all said they recorded the race or ethnicity of gang members. As with other types of data noted above, there was a difference between recording information and being able to report that information in summary form. Of the 72 large city police departments reporting gang crime problems, only 25 (35 percent) provided statistics on the ethnicity of identified gang members; of the 38 smaller cities, only 12 (32 percent) provided statistics on ethnicity. The ethnic composition of gang members in these cities remains predominantly black (48 percent) and Hispanic (43 percent). The black groups were made up primarily of African-Americans but also included Jamaicans and blacks of other countries.' The Color of Crime: a report on 1994 crime statistics, the most recent available. Major Findings: # There is more black-on-white than black-on-black violent crime. # Of the approximately 1,700,000 interracial crimes of violence involving blacks and whites, 90 percent are committed by blacks against whites. Blacks are therefore up to 250 times more likely to do criminal violence to whites than the reverse. # Blacks commit violent crimes at four to eight times the white rate. Hispanics commit violent crimes at approximately three times the white rate, and Asians at one half to three quarters the white rate. # Blacks are twice as likely as whites to commit hate crimes. # Hispanics are a hate crime victim category but not a perpetrator category. Hispanic offenders are classified as whites, which inflates the white offense rate and gives the impression that Hispanics commit no hate crimes. # Blacks are as much more dangerous than whites as men are more dangerous than women. Copyright ? 1999 by New Century Foundation
"They (MEChA) stand for Chicano power, the 'reqonquista' for Aztlan ? that's their little phrase for the Southwest United States ? and that the United States was stolen from Mexico, and they're going to reconquer it."
"General membership shall consist of any student who accepts, believes and works for the goals and objectives of MEChA, including the liberation of AZTLAN, meaning self-determination of our people in this occupied state and the physical liberation of our land."
California politicians who have never renounced their membership in the organization include Lieutenant Governor and current ex-officio UC Regent Cruz Bustamente, former State Assembly Speaker and Los Angeles mayoral candidate Antonio Villaraigosa, State Assemblyman Gil Cadillo and State Sen. Joe Baca.
Unless americans everywhere, and Californians particularly fancy themselves as self-destructive if not suicidal (although review of the crime stats would indicate the latter), it's time to throw the clintonian, incompetent bumbs and buddies, davis and bustamonte, OUT .
To Whom It May Concern:
I hate Pat McCoid's and her family's guts; I hate Pat McCoid;
I hate Pat M. I will have nothing whatsoever to do with them (as with
the other RICO and other defendants set forth herein), directly or indirectly.
The foregoing will never change, not ever!
Another message that won't ever change:
I am interested in no real property whatsoever to resolve the RICO Litigation,
but rather only in the very substantial money damages in accordance with law.
"Yes; tom tom mc tick tock is going to Disneyland, the fantasyland exhibit, where hypocrite would-be, wannabe spoiler can remain a legend in his own mind!"
10-7-03 - Election Day
?I feel absolutely terrific,? said Davis, a Democrat, who voted in West Hollywood. ?I have always trusted the voters of California, and I know they?re going to do the right thing today.?
Yes grey, they did (do the right thing today)!
10-7-03 - Election Day
And what gun might that be? Might that be the one between phil spector's
legs that he couldn't get up? Indeed, with fellow Christ-killing
jew bob shapiro on the case [remember him?; part of the "wet (d)ream team"
(also including disbarred liar bailey, johnny the ape play the race card cochran,
jew liar dershowitz) who got that murderous black ape simpson off, along with
the corrupt/incompetent d(ucks)a(ss) office of 'steve the cooley'(in the garcetti tradition)],
the bribe money must be flowing fast and furious.
phil spector is guilty of murder and should be imprisoned without delay (charged and prosecuted).
No. I didn't mean 'Hud'. Not a remake of or reprising that newman role, 'Hud'. Not a typo. Yes, pud. Slang for phallus. And, what or who could more exemplify, be the epitome and embodiment of and bear uncanny resemblence to 'pud', and representative of the the total disconnect between reality and "valuation" on wall street than a guy aptly named 'dick' (grasso). Doesn't he look like a "pud"? Click here to understand grasso's and the nyse's links to illegal drug money laundering
Many of my colleagues have encouraged me to write a response to Michael Medved's recent USA Today article in which he suggests that anyone who holds an opinion that the United States' lunar landings of the late 1960's and early 1970's were falsified for strategic benefit must be completely insane or mentally deficient. I, Bart Winfield Sibrel, am the writer, producer and director of A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, the documentary which inspired the recent Fox special, Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon?, for which I served as senior consultant and key interviewee.
Suggesting that the greatest event in human history was staged as a Cold War tactic to bluff the Soviet Union into a reserved nuclear posture, is, on the surface, seemingly preposterous. However, I, not Mr. Medved, have spent half a decade and $500,000 on research into just the possibility, as remote as it may be, that the boastful goal of a non-engineer politician in 1961 (John Kennedy) to "put a man on the moon by the end of the decade (December 31, 1969)" was a bite too large to chew.
After all, two decades later, with much improved and superior technology to that of 1969, a mission only 1/100th as complicated, the Earth orbit of a telescope (Hubble), was nearly as many years behind schedule as the entire duration of the lunar landing goal, and then, after its sixth launch attempt, didn't even work when it arrived at its destination which is 1/1000th the distance to the moon. In addition, it took another two years to make the necessary repairs to get it operational. Even today, an unmanned probe (to Mars), the size of a large toaster, requires nearly ten years to develop. Mr. Medved, where is the logic in this?
Unfortunately, Mr. Medved composed his article without even reviewing my film A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon? which contains newly discovered, unprecedented evidence consisting of a previously unseen, mislabeled, 31-year old unedited reel of footage from the first mission to the moon, Apollo 11, dated three days into the flight. In this footage Neil Armstrong himself is clearly visible staging part of the mission photography. Before I uncovered this mislabeled lost footage, and after three and a half years of research, I estimated the possibility of a government fraud of the lunar landings to be about 25%. After viewing this footage: 100%.
It is a fact. Humankind has not stepped foot on the moon. End of story. Proof of this is in my film. This whole endeavor really pushes people's buttons when it come to national pride. That is why I open my controversial documentary with a Renaissance painting of the Tower of Babel and a Biblical quote, "When pride cometh, then cometh shame" (Proverbs 11:2). Rivalry among nations began with which civilization could build the tallest building. Sound familiar? I then show the Titanic and the quote, "The Ship that God Himself could not sink!" Finally, I quote Nixon referring to Apollo 11's landing on the moon as the greatest event since creation.
When the USA Today writer refers to the crewmembers he doesn't even know as "brave astronauts" he clearly discloses his environmentally conditioned prejudice toward viewing this topic without any objectivity. If questioning the integrity of our government is so unpatriotic in his mind, he is forgetting that this is precisely how our nation was founded, questioning the ethics and motives of mother England. George Washington, the "Father" of our country, considered it a disgrace to his office to lie about the complete depravity of the condition of his army's morale, competence, resources and numbers against the attacking British army. He refused to "white wash" his dispatches to Congress in order to boost their pride or spirits. This kind of leadership, "I cannot tell a lie," is sorely missed in our government.
Furthermore, I can only assume Mr. Medved was referring to me as the "utterly uncredentialed investigative journalist." Funny, isn't it, that those making such accusations about such emotionally provocative topics are often guilty of the very charges they unthoughtfully assert against others. Had he done his research before writing the article (I spent 5 years on this subject, interviewing hundreds of sources), he would have discovered that the "uncredentialed" affiliation I had at the time of the commencement of my investigative journalist's research was none other than NBC News.
A little further investigation on Mr. Medved's part would have discovered that the NASA spokesperson on the program, Brian Welsh, definitely agreed with him in that he felt that his performance of impatient dismissive generalizations did not seem very convincing; rather, a point-for-point rebuttal would have been more appropriate. Apparently, in an effort to be better prepared in the future, Brian Welsh did his own off-the-record investigation with the special access privileges attack in November 2000 at age 42.
When Fox pointed out that eleven Apollo astronauts all had non-space related fatal accidents within a twenty-two month period of one another, he failed to mention that the odds of this happening were 1 in 10,000. Oddly enough, these were the same odds given to a successful manned moon landing on its first attempt by a senior space program employee in the mid-1960's. Nevertheless, Mr. Medved does raise some very good questions that should be addressed. The first is, "why did the Russians not blow the whistle on such a fraud?"
Because I strongly believe that the chief motive for the cover-up was to fool the Soviet Union into thinking that the US had superior missile technology that did not really exist, we need to understand how urgent and unprecedented a motive this was, note past occasions of now disclosed United States misinformation, analyze whether or not the Soviets had the capability to uncover it, and, if they did, question whether or not they would really broadcast this finding to the world. It is important to note, that at the dawn of the space race never before in human history had two "superpowers" each possessed the intercontinental nuclear missile capability of annihilating the other several times over from a location half way around the world.
Perhaps a reminder is in order as well to mention the fact that during this period the Russians launched the first artificial satellite, the first human in space, the first human to orbit the Earth, the first space walk, the first woman in space, the first crew of three into space, and the first of two simultaneously orbiting spacecraft rendezvousing. For every twenty hours the US had spent in space at the time the Soviets had spent one hundred. Five times the experience and expertise!
In 1994, our own government's watchdog agency, the General Accounting Office, reported, "The Star Wars Missile Defense System rigged tests to make it seem more advanced than it really was. The aim was to fool the Soviet Union about US strategic capability during the Cold War." How much more so was there the need in 1969 when there was genuine concern that "Sputnik 3" might have nuclear missiles on it for a first strike that would put the weapons within less than ten minutes from major targets in America? Furthermore, if the Soviets discovered the cover-up, at that time or years later, would it really be in their best interest to announce their finding to the world and thereby further escalate the tension between the superpowers? Better in my opinion, to hold on to such a juicy morsel and use it year after year to blackmail each succeeding US administration.
Another overlooked intriguing fact is that NASA launched the TETR-A satellite just months before the first lunar mission. The proclaimed purpose was to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that the Houston ground crews (all those employees sitting behind computer screens at Mission Control) could "rehearse" the first moon landing. In other words, though NASA claimed that the satellite crashed shortly before the first lunar mission ( a misinformation lie), its real purpose was to relay voice, fuel consumption, altitude, and telemetry data as if the transmissions were coming from an Apollo spacecraft as it neared the moon. Very few NASA employees knew the truth because they believed that the computer and television data they were receiving was the genuine article. Merely a hundred or so knew what was really going on; not tens of thousands as it might first appear.
For the USA Today writer to equate believing in this cover-up with denying the Jewish holocaust of World War II simply proves the superficiality of his investigation caused by his misdirected patriotism, or as it has been historically noted, "Zeal without knowledge." Were there only three witnesses to World War II? Of course not, yet this is the total number of witnesses to landing on the moon in 1969. Never before in history had such an historic event been without independent press coverage. Whatever sound and pictures were distributed to the public were strictly controlled and previewed by the Federal Government.
Could a fuzzy black-and-white television image be used to fool the public? Let's look at history. In the mid 1950's Time Magazine had on its cover " The Smartest Man in America" who was the latest winner on the popular TV game show The Sixty-four Thousand Dollar Question. It was later proven in a court of law that the man knew the answers in advance. Time Magazine was wrong! They were fooled just like the rest of us. In fact, in the Grand Jury investigation, it was later proven that one hundred twenty people who swore to God that they were telling the truth at the start of the investigation, in fact, lied to the Grand Jury!
What about Apollo 13? When America allegedly put humans on the moon for the second time (Apollo 12), several TV viewers telephoned the networks and complained that reruns of I Love Lucy were being interrupted. What a coincidence that the very next mission to the moon involved "life and death" jeopardy. Peoples' interest in return trips to the moon was rekindled!
What about the moon rocks? The Soviet Union never sent a manned mission to the moon, yet they have moon rocks. How did they get them? By unmanned probes and meteorites! The only time in history that an astronaut, Soviet or American, is said to have left the relative safety of Earth orbit and ventured through the Van Allen Radiation Belts, a twenty-five thousand mile thick band of intense radiation which surrounds the Earth beginning at an altitude of about one thousand miles, is going to the moon. The Soviets, with a five-to-one advantage in the early part of the space race, never once sent a human through the radiation belts to even orbit the moon.
In 1998, the Space Shuttle flew to one of its highest altitudes ever, three hundred fifty miles, hundreds of miles below merely the beginning of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Inside of their shielding, superior to that which the Apollo astronauts possessed, the shuttle astronauts reported being able to "see" the radiation with their eyes closed penetrating their shielding as well as the retinas of their closed eyes. For a dental x-ray on Earth which lasts 1/100th of? a second we wear a 1/4 inch lead vest. Imagine what it would be like to endure an hour and a half of radiation that you can see with your eyes closed from hundreds of miles away with 1/8 of an inch of aluminum shielding!
After this new generation of NASA astronauts encountered this unpredicted surprise, CNN (another "uncredentialed" source) issued the following report, "The radiation belts surrounding Earth may be more dangerous for astronauts than previously believed (like when they supposedly went through them thirty years ago to reach the moon.) The phenomenon known as the 'Van Allen Belts' can spawn (newly discovered) 'Killer Electrons' that can dramatically affect the astronauts' health.
It isn't an "utterly uncredentialed journalist" who is asserting that the Apollo 1 fire of January 27, 1967 that killed what would have been the first crew to walk on the moon just days after the commander, Gus Grissom, held an unapproved press conference complaining that they were at least ten years, not two, from reaching the moon. It is the dead man's own son, who is a seasoned pilot himself, and who has in his possession forensic evidence personally retrieved from the charred spacecraft (that the government has tried to destroy on two or more occasions), who is making this accusation. Mr. Medved, have you personally retrieved evidence from the space capsule to support your theory that this credible first hand assertion is unfounded?
Anyone with the slightest open mind and truly objective thinking can conclude that when the assassin of President Kennedy was assassinated himself three days later, that something was awry. The moon landings cover-up is even grander, yet, obviously, not the first, and it is certainly not the first time, or the last, that the press at large was completely wrong.
I sent a copy of this lost footage to every United States Senator and Congress Member (five hundred thirty-five), plus the president and the current director of the General Accounting Office. I have heard back from only four. In my letter I challenge them to summon Neil Armstrong himself to testify, under oath, whether or not he actually set foot on the moon in 1969. I caution them to get ready for the shock of their life. Oddly enough, in the thirty plus years since the event, Neil Armstrong has not granted, not even once, an on camera or independent print interview. Not to CNN, not to NBC, not to CBS, not to ABC, not to Time, Life or Newsweek. It is my conviction that he refuses to be interviewed because he does not want to lie. How does the lyric go? "Ask me no question, and I'll tell you no lies."
Recently, however, I had the good fortune to show this falsified mission footage to Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, Neil Armstrong's fellow crewmate. Quite startled and angry, he was most interested in how I attained this lost footage. He also threatened to sue me if I showed it publicly. Why? Because it is meaningless? If Mr. Medved is courageous, why not challenge me to a duel of the wits on his radio show for an open debate on this subject?
When rivalry among nations first reared its envious head thousands of years ago, the conquest was which civilization could build the tallest building, albeit by one story. Sound familiar? The monumental goal was never met and the project, the Tower of Babel, was abandoned in disgrace. At the dawn of the modern industrial revolution, the twentieth century, the largest single machine yet constructed by the hand of man was fashioned in 1912. It was boasted in print to be a marvel that, "God himself could not destroy." This great work of mankind, the Titanic, never even completed its first voyage. Richard Nixon was commander and chief during the reported Apollo landings on the moon. He called this historic occasion, "The greatest week since creation itself!"
I am Bart Winfield Sibrel, the writer, producer, director of "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" (moonmovie.com), a controversial documentary which questions the authenticity of the manned moon landings some thirty-three years ago. As an investigative journalist I spent five years and $500,000 researching this topic which seems, on the surface, to be completely ludicrous. Then I came upon a highly credible source, in his late seventies, who I verified worked for the space program during the 1960's. He asserted, most confidently, that the Apollo moon landings were first, impossible, and second, falsified as a Cold War tactic to bluff the Soviet Union into thinking the United States had greater capability than it really did.
I discovered that the highest ranking official at NASA resigned, without explanation, just days before the first Apollo mission. All three crew members of the first historic flight also resigned shortly thereafter. Neil Armstrong, the most famous astronaut because of supposedly being the first man on the moon, refused to even appear in a single still picture on the moon! Aside from the initial press conference immediately following the event, in which he seems very disgruntled, he has not given a single interview on the subject, in print or on camera, to anyone . . . ever! Some photography allegedly from the moon contain shadows that intersect with each other. (NASA claims that only sunlight was used and the sun always casts parallel shadows.)
In my research at NASA I uncovered, deep in the archives, one mislabeled reel from the Apollo 11, first mission, to the moon. What is on the reel and on the label are completely different. (I suspect an editor put the wrong label on the tape thirty-three years ago and no reporter ever had the motive to be as thorough as I.) It contains an hour of rare, unedited, color television footage that is dated by NASA's own atomic clock three days into the flight. Identified on camera are Neil Armstrong, Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin, and Michael Collins. They are doing multiple "takes" of a single shot of the mission, from which only about ten seconds was ever broadcast. Because I have uncovered the original unedited version, mistakenly not destroyed, the photography proves to be a clever forgery! Really! IT MEANS THEY DID NOT WALK ON THE MOON! (See "Uncovered Footage Described" from the home page.)
A USA Today writer composed an article calling my assertion "impossible" without even viewing "A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon" which contains the unprecedented footage, that I believe, would prove the fraud in a court of law! A friend of mine brought to my attention a human condition called, "Cognitive Dissonance." That is when someone has a long held belief rooted so deeply in their psyche that they can not see anything else, even if visible facts present themselves that prove contrary to their belief. The pride inducing moon landings can certainly cloud some people from seeing the distasteful truth. I showed this key footage to a retired military officer who believed in the moon landings. He actually walked out of my house when he saw it! (See no evil.) I was "dissing" America in his mind, even if it was true.
American military and political leaders "dissed" their own country when they falsified history by refusing to accept public defeat after John Kennedy pledged to "Put a man on the moon by the end of the 1960's." "When pride comes, then comes disgrace." (Proverbs 11:2) The government had already spent an equivalent of one hundred thirty-five billion dollars of taxpayer's money and disclosing their weakness to fulfill the boastful goal was apparently too much for their pride, or reelection chances, to endure. There was strategic advantage to the Soviet Union thinking the United States was that capable. It boosted national spirit during the Vietnam War. It made friends of friends in the government very, very rich.
Twenty years after Apollo, with much improved and superior technology than that of 1969, a mission only 1/100th as complicated, the earth orbit of a telescope (Hubble), was nearly as many years behind schedule as the entire development of the lunar landing program, and then, after five failed launch attempts, didn't even work when it arrived at its destination which was only 1/1000th the distance to the moon. In addition, it took another two years to make the necessary repairs to get it operational. Even today an unmanned space probe the size of a toaster oven requires nearly ten years to develop. In hindsight, isn't this rather odd?
At the time, with the advent of color TV's, mobile phones and microwave ovens, was perhaps our faith in the technological era overconfident? Could this belief have been taken advantage of? Could a fuzzy black-and-white television image be used to fool the public? Let's look at history. In the mid 1950's Time Magazine had on its cover "The Smartest Man in America" who was the latest winner of the popular TV game show "The Sixty-four Thousand Dollar Question". It was later proven in a court of law that the man knew the answers in advance! Time magazine was wrong! The story on the cover of their magazine was an absolute lie! The media was deceived themselves to better deceive the public! One big manipulation . . . and it was for only sixty-four thousand dollars.
This whole endeavor really pushes peoples' buttons when it comes to national pride. If questioning the integrity of our government is unpatriotic, then I am in good company, for this is precisely how our nation was founded. George Washington, the "Father" of our country, considered it a disgrace to his office to lie about the complete depravity of his army's morale, competence, resources and numbers against the attacking British army. He refused to "white wash" his dispatches to congress in order to falsely boost their pride or spirits. This kind of leadership, "I cannot tell a lie," is sorely missed in our government.
I believe that the chief motive for the cover-up was to fool the Soviet Union during the height of the Cold War into thinking that the US had superior technology that did not really exist, although pride, a Vietnam war distraction and misallocation of funds made it most beneficial as well. At the dawn of the "Space Race" never before in history had two "superpowers" each possessed the missile capability of annihilating the other several times over from a location half way around the world. The Russians launched the first artificial satellite, the first man in space, the first man to orbit the earth, the first space walk, the first woman in space, the first crew of three into space, and the first of two simultaneously orbiting spacecraft. For every twenty hours the US spent in space the Soviets spent one hundred! Five times the experience and, therefore, expertise.
In 1994, our own government's watchdog agency, the General Accounting Office, reported, "The Star Wars Missile Defense System rigged tests to make it seem more advanced than it really was. The aim was to fool the Soviet Union about US strategic capability during the Cold War." How much more so was there the need in 1969 for misinformation when there was concern, now admitted irrational, that "Sputnik 3" might have nuclear missiles on it for a first strike that would put the weapons within less than ten minutes from major targets in America? If the United States could put a man on the moon . . . maybe they would back off a little bit.
Never before in history had such an historic event been without independent press coverage. There were, after all, only three first hand witnesses to each moon landing. Whatever sound and pictures were shown to the public were strictly, and completely, controlled and previewed, by the federal government before they were broadcast or distributed to the populous. They went up in the rocket for sure. They splashed down in the ocean for sure. The newly discovered footage, however, clearly proves that they stayed in earth orbit for the entire eight days of each Apollo mission. Anyone open-minded can conclude that when the assassin of President Kennedy was assassinated himself three days later, that something was awry regardless of what the appointed politicians by the powers that be told the public.
Everyone who does wrong has their reasons. While the Cold War deception of advanced "Star Wars" technology that did not exist seems irrelevant today, acknowledging to the public that the greatest achievement of the United States, and supposedly the world, was an outright fraud, regardless of the motive, is likely more than our leaders have the character to admit. George Orwell said, "Whoever controls the past, controls the future." That is why the truth must come out. As our national budget quadruples in increase every year to that of the cost of living, those in power seem helpless to stop the beast they have created. When will it end? What will it take to stop it? A revelation such as this.
Professor James McCanney M.S. is a physicist who has spent decades promoting his theoretical work showing that the solar system is ever changing and is electrically active. These theories have been confirmed with space probe data and prove that there are definite Earth effects resulting from our sun's electrical activity. He has openly opposed NASA's view that outer space is electrically neutral.
McCanney was a faculty member of the Physics and Mathematics departments of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. He has researched theoretical Celestial Mechanics and Plasma Physics (for the layman, these are the studies of planetary motion and electrified gases in outer space), and has presented his theories at the Los Alamos National Laboratories and American Geophysical Union.
"Few people know that while we were not going to the moon in the 70's and while nasa was tearing down and destroying the physical complex and all records of the Saturn V moon rockets and the Apollo program, the Russians were launching daily and created a knowledge of how to live in space ... today we have NO ability to go into space ..." He goes on to discuss the radiation as conclusively preclusive of the purported "Apollo Missions".
Well you're talking to the wrong guy! Why don't you talk to the administrator at NASA? We were passengers.
Buzz Aldrin Apollo astronaut
This noteworthy comment by Buzz Aldrin was made after seeing a video produced by fellow researcher Bart Sibrel.
Him along with hitler, sharon, begin, idi amin, robert mugabe, osama bin laden, sadam hussein herod, stalin, clinton, caligula, etc.. "What has he been.................drinking?"
Other than fulfillment of "novellic prophesy" of William Golding (author of 'Lord of the Flies'), as successor (to lords of the flies, bush,sr., clinton) lord of the flies, I think NOT (this is no endorsement of the clintonian alternative).
Is there really, truly a doubt in anyone's mind that George Bush didn't actually choke while eating a pretzel, but rather blacked out while having "slipped/relapsed" and having drunk himself into a stupor.
As flies to a dung heap, they come to america where "rummy-dummy-dubya" is pre-ordained and destined to reprise the role of "senior" as "beelzebubush" in this modern-day, real-life (in the u.s.) equivalent of and as, "lord of the flies".
You see, democracy doesn't really exist in this corrupt criminal fraud of a nation, america. - more on this to come-