TOPICAL
INDEX
Page
I INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 1
Standard of
Review.............................................................. 1
II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
..................................................... 2
A.
Procedural
History.................................................................... 2
B.
Statement of
Facts..................................................................... 5
III. ARGUMENT.................................................................................. 7
Point I. Judicial Notice Of
Prior Decision/Ruling of Honorable
Gregory Keosian Dated 9-30-03, as
well as that of Judge Kaplan on
sustained, Along With the Doctrine of Res
Judicata (collateral estoppel,
by record or otherwise), Preclude J. Marcus’ Clear Error In
Dismissing
the present
case, based erroneously on the specious proposition, contrary
to law,
that this case was substantively the same as and being resolved in
case
#02E07192, and that it was a cause of action for perjury..... 7
Point II. Answer and Defenses Of
Defendant DeArenosa Were Stricken
And Summary Judgment As Filed and
Requested By Plaintiff
Should Have Been Entered As A Matter Of
Law................... 8
Point III. A Criminal Referral
Of Defendant DeArenosa’ s Documented
Crime of Perjury Should Have Issued From
The Court and Now
The Present Court Forthwith....................................................
12
IV.
CONCLUSION..............................................................................................
13
V. REQUEST FOR
JUDICIAL NOTICE ...................................................... 15