September 25, 2007



Federal Bureau of Investigation

600 State Street

New Haven, Connecticut 06511




Dear Sir/Madam:


 In accordance with my phone conversations this day with FBI Agent Tim I was told to forward the RICO Summary and related documents directly to Squad 7 at the aforementioned address and have enclosed herewith the following to facilitate your review:


       RICO Litigation Summary;

       Cross-motion for the Entry of Judgment against Defendant Coan, et als;

       Conformed Copies of the RICO Verified Complaint;

                                                  RICO Statement;

                                                  Affidavit in Support of Verified Complaint  (dismissed without prejudice requiring re-filing despite the fact that there is no extent Chapter 7 proceeding, substantial monies/assets unaccounted for, and Alan Shiff (former, now demoted, Chief Bankruptcy Court Judge who converted the Chapter 13 Case for which a plan had been filed to Chapter 7 on or about 5-1-96) having committed the RICO predicate acts of fraud connected with a case under Title 11 U.S.C., extortion (under color of right), and mail fraud, etc., though not a defendant. In light of the seriousness of the crimes involved, there has and continues to be substantial incentive to cover-up and obstruct justice as set forth is the Summary, Verified Complaint, RICO Statement, and supporting Affidavit, along with exhibits thereto.


All documents are set forth under penalty of perjury.


I had been asked to forward to former FBI Agent Barndollar and more recently (5-29-07 and the cross-motion 6-11-07) to your New Haven Office the non-legalese summary of the RICO Litigation (in no more than 5 pages) which is annexed hereto. I have enclosed some additional delivery confirmation receipts to the New Haven Office, etc., I was able to “dig out” (with the exception of the central pleadings for copies/transmission/filing, viz., RICO Verified Complaint, RICO Statement, Affidavit - courtesy copies to Chief Judges Chatigny, Dist.Ct., and Dabrowski, Bk.Ct., most of my things are packed in boxes and ready to move). The Cross Motion succinctly sets forth the factual/legal scenario, as well as Coan’s testimony before Judge Chatigny which culminated in Judge Chatigny’s ruling against Coan in Coan’s action to prevent me from suing him (he knew what he had done and I had to fly out there for the hearing). Consistent with the cover-up,  fraud connected with a case under Title 11 U.S.C., obstruction of justice, etc., federal judges have ignored Judge Chatigny’s ruling, particularly apposite inasmuch as there is no extent Chapter 7 case.






   This is not a complex matter. Indeed, from the investigative perspectives of motive, means, and opportunity, this case has always been quite simple. This is particularly so with

regard to defendant Coan’s liability at this juncture for which there is applicable insurance/surety coverage and no legitimate defense (RICO encompasses predicate acts, part of a pattern over a 10 year period as I’m sure you know. Moreover, it is a fundamental principle of RICO law that RICO standing requires only harm resulting proximately from the predicate offenses. It does not also require that this harm give rise to a civil claim based upon those predicate offenses. Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection Corp., 503 U.S. 258 (1992). Additionally, the RICO plaintiff need not have suffered harm from each predicate offense comprising the pattern. H.J. Inc. v Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 492 U.S. 229, 242 (1989). See, e.g., Ford Motor Co. v. Summit Motor Prods., Inc., 930 F.2d 277 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 939 (1991) (permitting a RICO claim based on violation of a court order to which plaintiff was not a party: the “standing inquiry in any civil RICO case depends solely on demonstrating injury to business or property, and not on satisfying any standing requirement attached to the predicate act”).


Please let me know if there is difficulty retrieving documents from Ron or if for any reason the files are incomplete inasmuch as I have copies of everything and can forward same on notice.


  Thanking you and hoping to speak with you within a reasonable time, I am



                                                                              Very Truly Yours,     




                                                                                        Albert L. Peia 

                                                                                        P.O. Box 862156

                                                                                        Los Angeles, CA 90086-2156






Street Address: *611 E. 5th Street, #404

                             Los Angeles, CA 90013

                             (213) 219-7649          


   *Mailing to P.O. Box 862156 More Reliable/Secure